the high court says we have to pay for inmate sex change.

 Once again the high court sticks it to the taxpayer.a man kills his wife,gets convicted of murder,then sues for a sex change.and what is amazing wins!it is not cruel and unusual punishment.he was born a man.he is a man.i know the argument,but he is not entitled to have a surgery if he is not in danger of his life.the court has swung so far that we know have to do elective surgery?whats next?breast implants?liposuction?when does the taxpayer have the right to say,i can not afford it ,and i working ,so why is it a convict has the absolute right?if they do then everyone has the right to have the state pay for any surgery,elective or other.this is ridiculous.we have people trying to make sure universal health care never happens,so why is it a right to have an elective sex change?